Occupied Territories

Begin Again” is as much a dialogue with Swift’s catalogue as a story of a budding relationship. The song’s first line is one she’s used before (in “Fifteen”), and she wields her tunes’ temporal geography for thematic purposes: where Swift narratives used to take place on Tuesdays (“You Belong With Me” “Forever and Always”), “Begin Again” culminates “on a Wednesday, in a café.” It’s as if she’s Bill Murray waking up at the end of Groundhog Day; on the final track of Red and after four albums obsessing over the minutiae of romantic tumult, Taylor emerges with this spare, tentative tale of rebirth. “I’ve been spending the last eight months/Thinking all love ever does is break and burn and end,” she whispers over brushed drums and gentle mandolin, her tones awed, her words still aching with hurt. Swift enjoys formal exercises — it’s part of her country tradition — and this has those in the malleability of the repeated “…but I do” refrain, which traverses the separation between private thoughts and public behavior (“You don’t know how nice that is”) and the present and the past (“He didn’t like it when I wore high heels”). But as important are the breaks with formal songwriting structure, which lends the song verisimilitude: the superfluously specific James Taylor reference, for instance, or the wordy, overly detailed description of certain Christmas traditions. Nevertheless, when it comes to getting over things, these mundanities matter.

Jonathan Bradley on Taylor Swift’s “Begin Again”

Change is a motherfucker when you run from it. And right now, the conservative movement in America is fleeing from dramatic change that is certain and immutable. A man of color is president for the second time, and this happened despite a struggling economic climate and a national spirit of general discontent. He has been returned to office over the specific objections of the mass of white men. He has instead been re-elected by women, by people of color, by homosexuals, by people of varying religions or no religion whatsoever. Behold the New Jerusalem. Not that there’s anything wrong with being a white man, of course. There’s nothing wrong with being anything. That’s the point.

This election marks a moment in which the racial and social hierarchy of America is upended forever. No longer will it mean more politically to be a white male than to be anything else. Evolve, or don’t. Swallow your resentments, or don’t. But the votes are going to be counted, more of them with each election. Arizona will soon be in play. And in a few cycles, even Texas. And those wishing to hold national office in these United States will find it increasingly useless to argue for normal, to attempt to play one minority against each other, to turn pluralities against the feared “other” of gays, or blacks, or immigrants, or, incredibly in this election cycle, our very wives and lovers and daughters, fellow citizens who demand to control their own bodies.

A CARELESS MAN'S CAREFUL DAUGHTER: i love on tori amos records when she just goes “well,” at the...

deadgirlfriends:

i love on tori amos records when she just goes “well,” at the beginning of a line as if she is going to say something and then doesn’t, letting her silence kind of hang in the air for a minute. i guess this is ironic because the song that is maybe her best known and most beloved is about ending…

This is one of my favorite things I’ve ever read about why the internet can be an amazing thing. James Brooks (who wrote it and who is also Elite Gymnastics, who make great music that you should listen to) is one of my favorite people.
Mike Watt tweeted about Minzy’s new haircut.

Mike Watt tweeted about Minzy’s new haircut.

tylermittan asked: Do you really think that transgender discrimination is the biggest civil rights issue right now? Like, nothing else tops it?

It doesn’t ever make sense to pit these kinds of struggles against oppression, discrimination, and just plain ignorance against one another (hello, intersectionality!), and in fact, I think doing so, and prioritizing one over the others (as Marxists did with class, which admittedly seemed like a good idea at the time), is kind of a hallmark of an outdated paradigm.

On the other hand, there are two ways we could more approvingly look at what Joe Biden said. First, it’s a rhetorical statement, as are most statements by politicians. There’s an important distinction to be made between speech that’s representative (accurately depicting an objective reality) and speech that’s generative (creating a new reality). I see Biden’s statement as being more generative: saying what he said communicated something very essential to the woman with whom he was speaking—the whole thing was part of a conversation, not a speech, after all—and put an issue on the political map that wasn’t really there before on a mainstream level. In that sense, it doesn’t matter if what he said is true, because it’s more valuable as a statement that redirects our attention to places where it hasn’t been and where it is needed.

But also, I think there’s another way to look at it. People get upset when you say one “civil rights issue” is the most important one, but in another sense, maybe it’s just that each era is defined by the issues that surface at the time. The late 1950s and early 1960s were defined by issues of race. That doesn’t mean that race isn’t an issue after that, nor that it somehow takes a backseat to other issues, but that it is no longer the emergent issue of that era. In the last few years, the right of gays and lesbians to get married was emergent in a way it wasn’t before, and the force of that is quite strong: already, I feel, there is so much more acceptance and embrace of difference re: sexuality among young people, like a radical shift from previous generations (even mine, and I’m only 27).

The reasons why the rights of trans people matter now are numerous. It’s a life or death matter for many. They constitute a relatively small minority of people, but to ignore the urgency of what they face every day would be inhuman. It’s not like being or not being able to get married, it’s about the right to even be recognized as who you ever (sometimes even by yourself). But also, I think it’s important because, for one, feminism is meaningless if it ignores trans people (and feminism is really, really important) and, secondly, gender is this giant, domineering force in our society, one I would argue is even more fundamental than sexuality, and there’s an urgent need for us to enlighten ourselves about it.

That’s why these issues transcend the groups they affect directly: combating misogyny affects women but also men, confronting homophobia affects gays and lesbians but also the straights, and opposing transphobia gets to the core of the gender mess that I think plagues the lives of even cis people. In some ways, and of course I can’t speak for them and don’t want to minimize what they are going through, I imagine there’s something really powerful about being trans (and we should regard it as just another awesome facet of being human) because it forces you to reflect on your gender identity more consciously. The whole nation could stand to do that (and I bet cis folks would learn a lot about themselves in the process), and if there’s the momentum, I don’t see why we shouldn’t see this issue as a defining one of the era in which we live.

imathers:

gradientlair:

This is truly beautiful. Clicking on the photograph takes you to the website that provides more information. Fight patriarchy and homophobia!

Literal, out-loud response to this when Anaïs showed me it: “THAT IS AWESOME.”




I love everything about this so much. See also: this.

imathers:

gradientlair:

This is truly beautiful. Clicking on the photograph takes you to the website that provides more information. Fight patriarchy and homophobia!

Literal, out-loud response to this when Anaïs showed me it: “THAT IS AWESOME.”

I love everything about this so much. See also: this.

(Source: sonofbaldwin, via occupythedisco)